Home News ‘Wet Markets’ Are Not As Bad for Health and Biodiversity As We Think

‘Wet Markets’ Are Not As Bad for Health and Biodiversity As We Think

‘Wet Markets’ Are Not As Bad for Health and Biodiversity As We Think

So-called ‘wet markets’ have been synonymous with the COVID-19 pandemic, ever since health officials predicted that the virus may have originated at one in the Chinese city of Wuhan. Since then, this theory has been disproven, with most scientists now believing that the contact was a human-to-human superspreader incident at the market. But many of us are still left in the dark as to the types of wet markets that exist and what dangers they may pose. Many governments around the world pushed for wet markets to be closed down in 2020. In April of that year, top US infectious disease specialist, Anthony Fauci, told Fox News that all wet markets should be “shut down right away.”

As well as fears over human health, wet markets have also been called out for threatening biodiversity as some are believed to sell threatened and declining wild-animal species. But new research suggests that it’s not that simple. Scientists are now making distinctions between the types of markets that exist – and some are not as bad as others. A recent study at Princeton University in the US claims that banning them outright may be a mistake, as most pose no threat to human health or biodiversity. In fact, the widespread shutting down of wet markets could have the unintended consequence of disrupting critical food supply chains.

What are the different types of wet markets that exist?

Wet markets sell consumption-orientated, perishable goods in non-supermarket settings all over the world. They are named after their frequently wet floors, as a result of regular washing to keep food stalls clean and the melting of ice to keep foods fresh. Some, but not all, also sell live animals. Wildlife wet markets sell non-domesticated wild animals and live-animal markets sell live animals. It’s these latter two types that pose risks to both human health and biodiversity. The Princeton study suggests that policymakers target these more high-risk settings and distinguish between “benign” and “dangerous” markets.

For a large proportion of people in China and across Asia, they are just places to buy fresh food like chicken, pork, and fish for the cheap. The sale of this food provides important livelihoods to independent smallholder farmers. The set-up of the markets also enables them to transport animals without the involvement of large-scale food processing firms that control contracts with supermarkets. Farmers are more independent and make more money as a result. Equally, a permanent shutdown of wet markets would affect patterns of food consumption. It would deprive Chinese consumers of a food sector that accounts for 30-59 percent of their food supplies.

A ban ‘driven by misunderstanding’

“The usage of the term ‘wet market’ is laced with negative undertones, especially in light of COVID-19. I believe this is driven, in part, by a misunderstanding of what these markets actually are,” says study lead author Bing Lin. Lin and his colleague David Wilcove researched wet markets around the world, considering factors like hygiene, size, density, and interspecies mixing. They also looked at the presence of live animals and whether markets were selling high disease-risk species too.

The researchers found that most wet markets are perfectly safe, with the majority only selling processed domesticated animals like poultry. “Growing up in metropolitan Indonesia and amidst the hustle of inner-city Taiwan, I knew from experience that wet markets differed drastically in their composition and constitution,” says Lin. We need to be targeted, risk-adjusted policies to mitigate the highest market risks instead of “sweeping but ineffectual short-term change,” he says, which could stimulate xenophobia, racism, and anti-Asian sentiment. Researchers hope that future research will continue to quantify the risk factors these markets pose, so decision-makers can better safeguard both human health and biodiversity.


Fiscal Stimulus Bolsters US Economic Growth in Q1, Fastest GDP Growth Since 2003

The second-fastest gross domestic product growth since the third quarter of 2003, reported by the Commerce Department on Thursday, left output just 0.9% shy of its level at the end of 2019.

US Economy Grew Robustly in First Quarter

GDP grew at a 6.4% annual rate in the quarter, leaving the economy within 1% of its peak.

Asia-Pacific Markets Broadly Lower As Investors Turn Cautious

Asia-Pacific markets struggled for gains Friday as investors turned cautious, despite a positive finish stateside in the previous session.

World Shares Near Record High on Strong US Economic Data and Earnings

US economic growth accelerated in the first quarter, fuelled by massive government aid.

How the US Won the Economic Recovery

I looked for a country that got the economic response to Covid-19 right. I found the US.

Barclays Boss Predicts Biggest Economic Boom Since 1948

The UK is about to experience its biggest economic boom since the aftermath of World War Two, according to Barclays boss Jes Staley. His upbeat...

Buying American Is Easier Said Than Done: Will Biden’s Plan Juice the US Economy?

Joe Biden and Donald Trump don't agree on much, but this much they do: We should buy American products. But that's easier said than done.

Silver Down As Dollar and Yields on Bonds Rose as US Economy Advanced

Benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury yields hovered near a more than two-week high, increasing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding bullion.

Yellen Doesn’t See Biden Plan Creating Inflation ‘Issue’

President Joe Biden’s economic plan is unlikely to create inflation pressure in the U.S. because the boost to demand will be spread over a decade, said Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

Inflationary Pressure, Hawkish Fed Official Remarks Keep US Stocks on Leash

Dow added 2.4%, the S&P 500 gained 5.6%, and the Nasdaq jumped 7%. Dow was down 0.54% at 33,875 while the S&P was down by 0.72%. Nasdaq was down by 0.85%.